Jump to content

Daniel R Athearn

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Daniel R. Athearn
Born1951 (age 74–75)
ResidenceEugene, OR, United States
NationalityUSA
Alma materUniversity of Oregon
Known forphysical explanation sans classical-materialist models, Whitehead's ideas on nature and physics
Scientific career
FieldsPhilosophy of physics, Natural philosophy

Daniel R. Athearn (born 1951) is an American philosopher of physics and natural philosopher known for his work on causal explanation in physical science. He is the author of Scientific Nihilism: On the Loss and Recovery of Physical Explanation (1994) and Fruits of Time: Nature and the Unfolding of Difference (2004). He argues that theoretical physics, while a powerful body of empirical knowledge, does not explain itself, and he advocates a rehabilitation of natural philosophy drawing in part on the process thought of Alfred North Whitehead.

Biography

Athearn earned a PhD in philosophy from the University of Oregon in 1989. He did not formally study physics, concentrating instead on the lay-accessible and philosophical aspects of the subject. He lives in Eugene, Oregon, and supports himself by playing classical violin in orchestras.

His first book, Scientific Nihilism: On the Loss and Recovery of Physical Explanation, appeared in 1994. It was followed by articles in Process Studies and Physics Essays, and by a second book, Fruits of Time: Nature and the Unfolding of Difference, in 2004. He has also worked on further projects, including a book concerned with refuting the doctrine of Creation.

Work

Athearn characterizes "scientific nihilism" as the widespread view that the prospects for genuine understanding in scientific knowledge are distinctly negative, a view he regards as especially characteristic of the philosophy of science. In Scientific Nihilism (State University of New York Press, 1994) he argues that the breakoff of narrative causal explanation in physics, though remarkable, is no basis for a negative view of scientific knowledge. He contends that radiation and field phenomena, including many of their most enigmatic features, remain amenable to causal explanation, and he rejects a clean bifurcation of philosophy and natural science in favor of a constructive rehabilitation of natural philosophy.

In Fruits of Time: Nature and the Unfolding of Difference (2004) he develops the view that physics is destined to enter a new era marked by an enlarged conception of physical knowledge. Much of his thought engages the ideas of Alfred North Whitehead on nature and physics, and he has written on Whitehead as a natural philosopher and on an ontological approach to explaining light.

Articles:

  • "Whitehead as Natural Philosopher: Anachronism or Visionsary?" Process Studies, V26, N3-4 (June 1998).
  • "Toward an Ontological Explanation of Light," Process Studies, V34, N1 (June 2005).

Abstracts

Books

External links