Compton Effect Obeys Newton's Law: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug |
fix apostrophes lost to the character-encoding bug (Einstein?s -> Einstein's); URLs left untouched |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
In 1923, Compton used Planck quantum hypothesis and mass-energy transformation formula to explain X-ray | In 1923, Compton used Planck quantum hypothesis and mass-energy transformation formula to explain X-ray's scattering effect. This article uses Planck quantum hypothesis and Newton's Law and gets the same conclusion. Meanwhile, Chinese professor Wu Youxun made an experiment in 1926 and the conclusion anastomosed. Through analysis, we can see that Newton's Law is authoritative and comprehensive, but Einstein's mass-energy transformation formula has some defects. From this point of view, this article is challenging the relativity. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|compton effect obeys newton 's law]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|compton effect obeys newton 's law]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity|compton effect obeys newton 's law]] | [[Category:Relativity|compton effect obeys newton 's law]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:03, 22 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Compton Effect Obeys Newton's Law |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Qing Zeng |
| Keywords | Compton, scattering, Newton, mass-energy relation |
| Published | 2010 |
| No. of pages | 7 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
In 1923, Compton used Planck quantum hypothesis and mass-energy transformation formula to explain X-ray's scattering effect. This article uses Planck quantum hypothesis and Newton's Law and gets the same conclusion. Meanwhile, Chinese professor Wu Youxun made an experiment in 1926 and the conclusion anastomosed. Through analysis, we can see that Newton's Law is authoritative and comprehensive, but Einstein's mass-energy transformation formula has some defects. From this point of view, this article is challenging the relativity.