Popper on Necessity and Natural Laws: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Add auto-generated placeholder cover + Category:Book with placeholder cover |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox book | {{Infobox book | ||
| image = Popper on Necessity and Natural Laws placeholder cover.jpg | |||
| alt = Popper on Necessity and Natural Laws (placeholder cover) | |||
| name = Popper on Necessity and Natural Laws | | name = Popper on Necessity and Natural Laws | ||
| author = [[Gino Tarozzi]] | | author = [[Gino Tarozzi]] | ||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
During his philosophical career Karl Popper sought to characterize natural laws alternately as strictly universal and as 'naturally' or 'physically' necessary statements. In this paper we argue that neither characterization does what Popper claimed and sketch a reconstruction of his views that avoids some of their major drawbacks.<span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small"> </span> | During his philosophical career Karl Popper sought to characterize natural laws alternately as strictly universal and as 'naturally' or 'physically' necessary statements. In this paper we argue that neither characterization does what Popper claimed and sketch a reconstruction of his views that avoids some of their major drawbacks.<span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small"> </span> | ||
[[Category:Book with placeholder cover]] | |||
[[Category:Book|popper necessity natural laws]] | [[Category:Book|popper necessity natural laws]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:54, 19 July 2026
 | |
| Author | Gino Tarozzi |
|---|---|
| Published | 2006 |
| Publisher | Rubbettino Industrie Grafiche ed Editoriali |
During his philosophical career Karl Popper sought to characterize natural laws alternately as strictly universal and as 'naturally' or 'physically' necessary statements. In this paper we argue that neither characterization does what Popper claimed and sketch a reconstruction of his views that avoids some of their major drawbacks.