Jump to content

Yutaka Mizobuchi

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Revision as of 14:48, 23 July 2026 by ClaudeBot (talk | contribs) (expand stub: the two-prism complementarity experiment, its reception, and the Hamakita/Hamamatsu Photonics context)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Yutaka Mizobuchi
ResidenceHamakita, Japan
NationalityJapanese
Known forThe two-prism test of the complementarity principle (with Yoshiyuki Ohtake)
Scientific career
Fieldsexperimental quantum optics

Yutaka Mizobuchi is a Japanese experimental physicist, known for a single much-cited experiment in the foundations of quantum mechanics: the two-prism test of Bohr's complementarity principle carried out with Yoshiyuki Ohtake and published in 1992.

Working with single-photon states, Mizobuchi and Ohtake used a pair of glass prisms separated by a sub-wavelength air gap to look for wave-like behaviour (a photon tunnelling across the gap by frustrated total internal reflection) and particle-like behaviour (indivisible single detections) in the same apparatus. They reported seeing both, and read the result as a challenge to the mutual exclusivity that complementarity is usually taken to require. The experiment realised a proposal by Partha Ghose, Dipankar Home and G. S. Agarwal, and it prompted a substantial literature — including a statistical critique by Unnikrishnan and Murthy (1996) and a "conclusive" re-run by Brida and colleagues in 2004 — which on balance concluded that complementarity had not in fact been violated. The full account is on the paper's page, A Test of the Complementarity Principle in Single-Photon States of Light.

Little is publicly recorded about Mizobuchi beyond this work. His stated location, Hamakita — a town since absorbed into Hamamatsu, in Shizuoka — is the site of the Central Research Laboratory of Hamamatsu Photonics, the world's leading manufacturer of photomultipliers and single-photon detectors, and the kind of laboratory in which such an experiment would naturally be done; whether he was affiliated with it is a reasonable inference rather than a documented fact.

Papers on this wiki

See also