Jump to content

A Note Regarding Relativity: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


A minor error in Einstein's 1905 seminal work on relativity, ?gOn the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies,?h is used to resolve the well?]known ?gtwin paradox.?h This is not a refutation of relativity theory, because the correctness of the transformation formulas is presumed.
A minor error in Einstein's 1905 seminal work on relativity, "gOn the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies,?h is used to resolve the well"]known ?gtwin paradox.?h This is not a refutation of relativity theory, because the correctness of the transformation formulas is presumed.


[[Category:Scientific Paper|note regarding relativity]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|note regarding relativity]]

Latest revision as of 14:00, 22 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleA Note Regarding Relativity
Author(s)[[]]
Keywordstime dilation, special relativity, twin paradox, Einstein
Published1991
JournalPhysics Essays
Volume4
Number1
No. of pages2
Pages42-44

Abstract

A minor error in Einstein's 1905 seminal work on relativity, "gOn the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies,?h is used to resolve the well"]known ?gtwin paradox.?h This is not a refutation of relativity theory, because the correctness of the transformation formulas is presumed.