Newton vs. Einstein: Difference between revisions
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
<span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman"> This paper demonstrates that the redshift of galaxies and quasars is due to a | <span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman"> This paper demonstrates that the redshift of galaxies and quasars is due to a "gravitational braking" of light and not to a so-called expansion of the universe. It shows further that the velocity of any material body in movement with respect to "the cosmological background" will progressively decrease and eventually cancel out. Moreover, any movement is absolute and independent of an observer, and the GRT gives here erroneous results. | ||
</span></span> | </span></span> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:55, 22 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Newton vs. Einstein |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Marcel Luttgens |
| Keywords | redshift, gravitational braking |
| Published | 1998 |
| Journal | Apeiron |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 1-2 |
| No. of pages | 5 |
| Pages | 25-30 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This paper demonstrates that the redshift of galaxies and quasars is due to a "gravitational braking" of light and not to a so-called expansion of the universe. It shows further that the velocity of any material body in movement with respect to "the cosmological background" will progressively decrease and eventually cancel out. Moreover, any movement is absolute and independent of an observer, and the GRT gives here erroneous results.