General relativity: Difference between revisions
Fix red links: delink keyword; correct two paper links to exact titles (curly apostrophe / mojibake) |
Fill the empty 'Incompatibility with quantum mechanics' heading left in the 2026-07-16 rewrite |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
===Incompatibility with quantum mechanics=== | ===Incompatibility with quantum mechanics=== | ||
The two pillars of twentieth-century physics have never been reconciled, and several authors here treat that failure as evidence against general relativity rather than as a problem awaiting a technical solution. [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]] argues the point directly in ''[[The Incompatibility of General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics]]'' (2004), which contends that results from gravitational experiments with atomic clocks establish the incompatibility outright. | |||
Others look for the join in a different place. [[Robert J Heaston]]'s ''[[Quantum Gravity and the Structure of the Electron]]'' (2005) observes that calls for a theory of quantum gravity have generally been pursued at the Planck scale, where the quantum is associated with the Einstein field equations, and takes up Hawking's and Penrose's alternative suggestion that quantum gravity may instead occur at the curvature of the [[Electron|electron]]. Related material is collected under [[Quantum Gravity]] and [[Quantum mechanics]]. | |||
The long-standing failure to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics is treated by some authors as evidence of a defect in the theory itself, as in ''[[Introducing Integral Geometry: Are Notational Flaws Responsible For the Inability to Combine General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics?]]''. | The long-standing failure to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics is treated by some authors as evidence of a defect in the theory itself, as in ''[[Introducing Integral Geometry: Are Notational Flaws Responsible For the Inability to Combine General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics?]]''. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:47, 21 July 2026
This Natural Philosophy wiki page disputes content found on Wikipedia page wikipedia:General relativity
| Scientific Theory | |
|---|---|
| Name | General relativity |
| Type | Theory of gravitation |
| Author(s) | Albert Einstein |
| Keywords | Relativity, general relativity, Gravity, spacetime curvature, equivalence principle, field equations |
| Year | 1915 |
General relativity is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915. It generalizes special relativity and Newton's law of universal gravitation, describing gravity not as a force but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime produced by mass and energy. In mainstream physics it is regarded as well confirmed by observation; this wiki documents a body of work that disputes it, collected in the criticisms section below.
Central ideas
- Curved spacetime — mass and energy curve the geometry of spacetime, and freely falling bodies follow the straightest available paths (geodesics) through that geometry.
- Equivalence principle — locally, the effects of gravitation are indistinguishable from those of acceleration.
- Einstein field equations — a set of equations relating the curvature of spacetime to the distribution of mass and energy.
Principal predictions
In its conventional form the theory is credited with predicting:
- the precession of the perihelion of Mercury;
- the bending of starlight passing near the Sun (reported as confirmed during the 1919 solar eclipse);
- gravitational redshift of light;
- gravitational waves; and
- black holes and an expanding universe.
Criticisms of general relativity on this wiki
The community of the John Chappell Natural Philosophy Society, which maintains this wiki, has published a range of work challenging general relativity. The arguments summarized below are drawn from works catalogued here and are attributed to their authors; they run contrary to the mainstream scientific consensus. Many more are indexed under Category:Relativity.
Theoretical and mathematical inconsistencies
Papers such as Some Rectifiable Inconsistencies and Related Problems in Einstein's General Relativity and The Need for a Critical Reappraisal of Einstein's General Relativity argue that the theory contains internal inconsistencies. In The Correct Derivation of Kepler's Third Law for Circular Orbits Reveals a Fatal Flaw in General Relativity Theory, the author contends that a corrected orbital derivation exposes a fundamental error in the theory.
Observational and astronomical failures
Several works claim that the theory fails against astronomical data, particularly for binary-star systems — for example 1997 General Relativity Failures: The Case of SW Canis Majoris Binary Stars Systems and 2008 General Relativity Failures: The Case of V731 Cep Binary Stars Motion Puzzle Solution Without Rigging. The status of the equivalence principle, on which the theory rests, is questioned in Eotvos' Experiment, General Relativity and the Problem of Incommensurability.
Incompatibility with quantum mechanics
The two pillars of twentieth-century physics have never been reconciled, and several authors here treat that failure as evidence against general relativity rather than as a problem awaiting a technical solution. Vyacheslav N Streltsov argues the point directly in The Incompatibility of General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics (2004), which contends that results from gravitational experiments with atomic clocks establish the incompatibility outright.
Others look for the join in a different place. Robert J Heaston's Quantum Gravity and the Structure of the Electron (2005) observes that calls for a theory of quantum gravity have generally been pursued at the Planck scale, where the quantum is associated with the Einstein field equations, and takes up Hawking's and Penrose's alternative suggestion that quantum gravity may instead occur at the curvature of the electron. Related material is collected under Quantum Gravity and Quantum mechanics.
The long-standing failure to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics is treated by some authors as evidence of a defect in the theory itself, as in Introducing Integral Geometry: Are Notational Flaws Responsible For the Inability to Combine General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics?.
Proposed alternatives
Rather than only criticizing, some authors propose replacement theories of gravitation, such as A New Theory of Gravity: Overcoming Problems with General Relativity. A broader survey of open issues appears in Unsolved Problems in Special and General Relativity.
Systematic catalogues
The scale of the dissenting literature covering both of Einstein's theories is documented in Chapter 2 - Catalogue of Errors for Both Theories of Relativity (2012), translated from the documentation of G O Mueller, which surveys decades of criticism and identifies thousands of critical works.