Relative Light Speed: Difference between revisions
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 2010 | | published = 2010 | ||
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | | journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 8 | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
| pages = 249-251 | | pages = 249-251 | ||
Latest revision as of 09:32, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Relative Light Speed |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Daniel Lee Haulman |
| Keywords | light speed, speed of light, relativity theory, Quantum Theory |
| Published | 2010 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 8 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
| Pages | 249-251 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Max Planck's Quantum Theory and Albert Einstein's Relativity Theory contradict each other. If one is true, the other is false. Scientists continue to imagine that both are true, applying Quantum Theory to very small objects and subatomic particles, and Relativity Theory to very large objects and space. However, the two theories cannot both be true. I believe that if one of the theories must be discarded, it should be Relativity Theory, because it is based on the false premise that the speed of light is not relative.