Einstein's Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Fallacious Claims in Common Arguments against FTL): Difference between revisions
Add to Category:Electromagnetism |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | | journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | ||
| number = | | number = 44 | ||
| num_pages = 9 | | num_pages = 9 | ||
| pages = 21-29 | | pages = 21-29 | ||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Einstein\'s Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Fallacious Claims in Common Arguments against FTL) |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | Leslee A Kulba |
| Keywords | relativity, electromagnetism |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 44 |
| No. of pages | 9 |
| Pages | 21-29 |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
Inferences drawn from Einstein's theories are counterintuitive. Justifications for the theories are hand-wavy at best. Newton's law of gravitation and Coulomb's force law for electrostatics provide explanations for experimental "proof" of Einstein's theories that is not only less exotic, but a natural consequence of the inertial and electrostatic properties believed to be possessed by protons and electrons.