The B(3) Field Controversy: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 2000 | | published = 2000 | ||
| journal = [[Apeiron]] | | journal = [[Apeiron]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 7 | ||
| number = | | number = 1-2 | ||
| num_pages = 12 | | num_pages = 12 | ||
| pages = 17-28 | | pages = 17-28 | ||
Revision as of 09:21, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The B(3) Field Controversy |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Geoffrey Hunter |
| Keywords | Stokes Theorem, Myron Evans, B(3) Magnetic Field |
| Published | 2000 |
| Journal | Apeiron |
| Volume | 7 |
| Number | 1-2 |
| No. of pages | 12 |
| Pages | 17-28 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The controversy generated by the theory of the B(3) magnetic field is considered in the light of a paradox raised by E. Comay and its repudiation by M. W. Evans and S. Jeffers. Their arguments are examined and assessed.