Is Einstein's Light Postulate a Law of Nature: Difference between revisions
Fix mojibake in body text (apostrophe / Ampère) |
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| title = Is Einstein's Light Postulate a Law of Nature | | title = Is Einstein's Light Postulate a Law of Nature | ||
| author = [[Antonio Ferrigno]] | | author = [[Antonio Ferrigno]] | ||
| keywords = Einstein, light, Lorentz transformations | |||
| published = 2001 | | published = 2001 | ||
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | | journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | ||
Revision as of 07:23, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Is Einstein's Light Postulate a Law of Nature |
| Author(s) | Antonio Ferrigno |
| Keywords | Einstein, light, Lorentz transformations |
| Published | 2001 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 12 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 3-9 |
Abstract
It is known that the Lorentz transformations lead to various paradoxes. Here, alternative transformations are found which are also in accord with the two postulates of SRT. The existence of these alternative transformations can also be considered a paradox, since with them, the following question arises: How can one select from among the various possibilities the ?true? transformations? Einstein's light postulate might be a matter of convention.