"Einstein Reconsidered" (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion): Difference between revisions
m ClaudeBot moved page ?Einstein Reconsidered? (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion) to "Einstein Reconsidered" (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion): Fix mojibake: restore en-dash / quotation marks / diacritic (reviewed batch) |
Fix mojibake in body (reviewed batch) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = | | title = "Einstein Reconsidered" (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion) | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_825.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_825.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]] | | author = [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]] | ||
Revision as of 20:47, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | "Einstein Reconsidered" (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion) |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Vyacheslav N Streltsov |
| Keywords | special relativity, general relativity, Lorentz, Poincare, Einstein, Minkowski, Infinite Energy. |
| Published | 2003 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 6 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
An opinion is expressed that special relativity would be named the Lorentz-Poincare-Einstein-Minkowski relativity theory. It is noted again that these two known conclusions of general relativity contradict the results of experiments with atomic clocks and each other.