Data That Allegedly Proves Special Relativity Disproves It: Difference between revisions
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
Add to Category:Time |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
[[Category:Time]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:42, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Data That Allegedly Proves Special Relativity Disproves It |
| Author(s) | Nick Percival |
| Keywords | time dilation, clock retardation, special relativity, Lorentz relativity |
| Published | 2013 |
| No. of pages | 5 |
Abstract
This paper analyzes data from GPS, the Hafele-Keating Experiment and muon decay measurements that are claimed to support Special Relativity’s claim of time dilation. It is found that this data actually does not support Special Relativity and in some cases is evidence against Special Relativity. The “time dilation” data is also analyzed in terms of its historical development and in terms of the Twin Paradox.