Lichtbrechung und Reflexion: Difference between revisions
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Lichtbrechung und Reflexion | | title = Lichtbrechung und Reflexion | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20151222235532/http://www.dinglinger-drg.de/lichtbrechung_und_reflexion.html Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | |||
| author = [[G?nter Dinglinger]] | | author = [[G?nter Dinglinger]] | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20151222235532/http://www.dinglinger-drg.de/lichtbrechung_und_reflexion.html here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)'' | |||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Revision as of 09:20, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Lichtbrechung und Reflexion |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | G?nter Dinglinger |
| Published | 2008 |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
Die Theorie der Geometrischen Optik ist genau so unbefriedigend wie die Annahme der Dualit?t des Lichtes. Die Widerspr?che werden an Hand von Zitaten aus der wissenschaftlichen Literatur dargelegt. Die alternative Theorie, dass Licht nur Teilchenstrom ist, wird im Folgenden mit entsprechenden Argumenten dargelegt.