Better Big Bang or A more Believable Singularity: Difference between revisions
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Better Big Bang or A more Believable Singularity | | title = Better Big Bang or A more Believable Singularity | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20080602211147/http://homepages.xnet.co.nz/~hardy/a_better_singularity.html Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | |||
| author = [[David Calder Hardy]] | | author = [[David Calder Hardy]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20080602211147/http://homepages.xnet.co.nz/~hardy/a_better_singularity.html here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)'' | |||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Revision as of 09:20, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Better Big Bang or A more Believable Singularity |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | David Calder Hardy |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
One singularity? You've got to be kidding. How about trillions and trillions and trillions of singularities. And I can hear all those voices out there shouting 'Contradiction in terms'. - but wait, impatience will get you nowhere! Here is a Better Big Bang - called BBB for short.
Once upon a time, for every cubic centimetre of space there were more or less one million singularities, and they all looked just the same. They had a very special problem, and that is they were repulsive. - Now don't get me wrong because I don't mean in an offensive way; it's just that they repelled each other. (I'm calling them singularities because they are/were the smallest indivisible particle).