Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake | | title = Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_849.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_849.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Ajay Sharma]] | | author = [[Ajay Sharma]] | ||
Revision as of 23:39, 19 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Ajay Sharma |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Old and New Concepts of Physics |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 3 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 553-558 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here.