Einstein's Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Fallacious Claims in Common Arguments against FTL): Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Einstein | | title = Einstein's Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Fallacious Claims in Common Arguments against FTL) | ||
| author = [[Leslee A Kulba]] | | author = [[Leslee A Kulba]] | ||
| keywords = [[relativity]], [[electromagnetism]] | | keywords = [[relativity]], [[electromagnetism]] | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 19 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Einstein's Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Fallacious Claims in Common Arguments against FTL) |
| Author(s) | Leslee A Kulba |
| Keywords | relativity, electromagnetism |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 44 |
| No. of pages | 9 |
| Pages | 21-29 |
Abstract
Inferences drawn from Einstein's theories are counterintuitive. Justifications for the theories are hand-wavy at best. Newton's law of gravitation and Coulomb's force law for electrostatics provide explanations for experimental "proof" of Einstein's theories that is not only less exotic, but a natural consequence of the inertial and electrostatic properties believed to be possessed by protons and electrons.