Jump to content

Thomas N Lockyer: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Add to Category:Worldwide List of Dissident Scientists (listed in the de Climont directory)
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Fix semantic date-template misuse: death_date field used {{birth date}}, which tags a death as a bday microformat -> switched to {{death date}} (same parameters)
Line 4: Line 4:
| alt = Thomas N. Lockyer
| alt = Thomas N. Lockyer
| birth_date = {{birth date|1926|10|10|mf=y}}
| birth_date = {{birth date|1926|10|10|mf=y}}
| death_date = {{birth date|2012|11|03|mf=y}}
| death_date = {{death date|2012|11|03|mf=y}}
| fields = [[Electronics Engineer]]
| fields = [[Electronics Engineer]]
| residence = Los Altos, CA, United States
| residence = Los Altos, CA, United States

Revision as of 09:06, 19 July 2026

Thomas N. Lockyer
Thomas N. Lockyer
Born(1926-10-10)October 10, 1926
DiedNovember 3, 2012(2012-11-03)
ResidenceLos Altos, CA, United States
NationalityUSA
Known forParticle Physics, Nuclear Structure
Scientific career
FieldsElectronics Engineer

Thomas Neudorfer Lockyer (1926- ) served in the U.S. Navy in WWII, with a technical rank of Petty Officer AETM3/c. Returning in 1946, he rejoined Westinghouse Transformer Division (1944-1954) during which he was granted one patent. From 1954 to 1959 he was at Motorola in Phoenix. AZ. Then, at Philco, Palo Alto, CA as an Electronic Engineer was granted a second patent, and was elected as a Fellow in the College of Relay Engineers, for a paper presented at the 11th NARM National Relay Conference, OSU, 1963. Retired from Ford Aerospace Corporation (now Lockheed-Martin Aerospace), as Supervisor of Engineering Standards in 1985, he has to date written four books and several papers on the structure of energy and matter. He holds two patents, and is a member emeritus of the AAAS. His interest in alternative physics was fueled in part when his son Richard, who graduated in physics from Stanford in 1973, found he couldn't accept quark theory or the mainstream interpretation of Schroedinger's equation.

Abstracts

Books

Media