Three Arguments on the Nature of Space: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| keywords = [[nature]], [[space]], [[geometry]], [[general relativity]], [[Maxwell's equations]], [[Lesagian particles]], [[waves]] | | keywords = [[nature]], [[space]], [[geometry]], [[general relativity]], [[Maxwell's equations]], [[Lesagian particles]], [[waves]] | ||
| published = 1983 | | published = 1983 | ||
| pages = 39-43 | | pages = 39-43 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 19:34, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Three Arguments on the Nature of Space |
| Author(s) | John B Kizer |
| Keywords | nature, space, geometry, general relativity, Maxwell's equations, Lesagian particles, waves |
| Published | 1983 |
| Pages | 39-43 |
Abstract
The best and simplest models of reality are visualizable models as opposed to formal models. It is proved that non-Euclidean geometry only exists as a special case of a higher dimensional Euclidean geometry, thereby negating general relativity.
The infalling saves of Maxwell's equations, a perennial problem for electrodynamics theorists, can be explained as Lesagian particles (or waves).
A consistent theory of the Lorentz transformation is developed, including a new explanation of the Airy experiment.