Evidence For Weber-Wesley Electrodynamics: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| keywords = [[Weber-Wesley electrodynamics]], [[electromagnetic radiation]], [[antenna]], [[velocity]] | | keywords = [[Weber-Wesley electrodynamics]], [[electromagnetic radiation]], [[antenna]], [[velocity]] | ||
| published = 1989 | | published = 1989 | ||
| pages = 289-343 | | pages = 289-343 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:25, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Evidence For Weber-Wesley Electrodynamics |
| Author(s) | Paul Wesley |
| Keywords | Weber-Wesley electrodynamics, electromagnetic radiation, antenna, velocity |
| Published | 1989 |
| Pages | 289-343 |
Abstract
Weber-Wesley electrodynamics predicts all of the usual results of the Maxwell theory including electromagnetic radiation. It also predicts results where the Maxwell theory fails or is not applicable:
- the force on Ampere's bridge in agreement with the measurements of Moyssides and Pappas
- the tension required to rupture current carrying wires as observed by Graneau
- the force to drive the Graneau-Hering submarine
- the force to drive the mercuty in Hering's pump
- the zero self-torque observed by Pappas and Vaughan on a Z-shaped antenna
- the localized unipolar induction observed by Kennard and Muller
- the result of Kaufman's measurement of e/m without mass change with velocity
- a nonradiating hydrogen atom, and
- the fine-structure splitting of hydrogen-atom energy levels without mass change with velocity.
It is concluded that there is, thus, no evidence supporting mass change with velocity. Experiments are suggested.