Logical Analysis of Special Relativity: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| keywords = [[Special Relativity]] | | keywords = [[Special Relativity]] | ||
| published = 1998 | | published = 1998 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:22, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Logical Analysis of Special Relativity |
| Author(s) | John E Chappell |
| Keywords | Special Relativity |
| Published | 1998 |
Abstract
Special relativity (SR) is a construct of the subcultur. of physics, not a certain reflection of reality. It is inferior to various other theories that explain the same evidence because It is based on Invalid logic: its two postulates contradict each other, and each commits the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. The simultaneity thought experillent 15 totl:l1ly invalidated by violating the law of noncontradiction; suggestions are made on how to reinterpret it rationally in terms of aether theory.