Surface Brightness in Plasma-Redshift Cosmology: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Add full-text link (reconnected from abstracts archive; URL verified live) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Surface Brightness in Plasma-Redshift Cosmology | | title = Surface Brightness in Plasma-Redshift Cosmology | ||
| url = [http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0605599v2 Link to paper] | |||
| author = [[Ari Brynjolfsson]] | | author = [[Ari Brynjolfsson]] | ||
| published = 2006 | | published = 2006 | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
| num_pages = 16 | | num_pages = 16 | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Read the full paper''' [http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0605599v2 here] | |||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Revision as of 18:50, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Surface Brightness in Plasma-Redshift Cosmology |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Ari Brynjolfsson |
| Published | 2006 |
| Journal | ArXiv |
| No. of pages | 16 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
In 2001 Lori M. Lubin and Allan Sandage, using big-bang cosmology for interpreting the data, found the surface brightness of galaxies to be inversely proportional to about the third power of (1+z), while the contemporary big-bang cosmology predicts that the surface brightness is inversely proportional to the fourth power of (1+z). In contrast, these surface brightness observations are in agreement with the predictions of the plasma-redshift cosmology. Lubin and Sandage (2001) and Barden et al. (2005), who surmised the big-bang expansion, interpreted the observations to indicate that the diameters of galaxies are inversely proportional to (1+z). In contrast, when assuming plasma-redshift cosmology, the diameters of galaxies are observed to be constant independent of redshift and any expansion. Lubin and Sandage (2001) and Barden et al. (2005), when using big-bang cosmology, observed the average absolute magnitude of galaxies to decrease with redshift; while in plasma redshift cosmology it is a constant. Lubin and Sandage and Barden et al. suggested that a coherent evolution could explain the discrepancy between the observed relations and those predicted in the big-bang cosmology. We have failed to find support for this explanation. We consider the observed relations between the redshift and the surface-brightness, the galaxy diameter, and the absolute magnitude to be robust confirmations of plasma-redshift cosmology.. Comment: First presented at the NES-APS Meeting in Boston, MA, April 1, 2006. Only minor editorial changes from v1 to v2.