The Kruskal-Szekeres "Extension": Counter-Examples: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The Kruskal-Szekeres ?coordinates? are said to ?extend? the so-called ?Schwarzschild solution?, to remove an alleged ?coordinate singularity? at the event horizon of a black hole at r = 2m, leaving an infinitely dense point-mass singularity at ?the origin? r = 0. However, the assumption that the point at the centre of spherical symmetry of the ?Schwarzschild solution? is at ?the origin? r = 0 is erroneous, and so the Kruskal- Szekeres ?extension? is invalid; demonstrated herein by simple counter-examples.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | The Kruskal-Szekeres ?coordinates? are said to ?extend? the so-called ?Schwarzschild solution?, to remove an alleged ?coordinate singularity? at the event horizon of a black hole at r = 2m, leaving an infinitely dense point-mass singularity at ?the origin? r = 0. However, the assumption that the point at the centre of spherical symmetry of the ?Schwarzschild solution? is at ?the origin? r = 0 is erroneous, and so the Kruskal- Szekeres ?extension? is invalid; demonstrated herein by simple counter-examples. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|kruskal-szekeres extension counter-examples]] | |||
Revision as of 14:17, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Kruskal-Szekeres ?Extension?: Counter-Examples |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Stephen John Crothers |
| Published | 2009 |
| Journal | Progress In Physics |
| No. of pages | 5 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The Kruskal-Szekeres ?coordinates? are said to ?extend? the so-called ?Schwarzschild solution?, to remove an alleged ?coordinate singularity? at the event horizon of a black hole at r = 2m, leaving an infinitely dense point-mass singularity at ?the origin? r = 0. However, the assumption that the point at the centre of spherical symmetry of the ?Schwarzschild solution? is at ?the origin? r = 0 is erroneous, and so the Kruskal- Szekeres ?extension? is invalid; demonstrated herein by simple counter-examples.