Covariant Ether Theories: Part II: Difference between revisions
fix apostrophes lost to the character-encoding bug (Einstein?s -> Einstein's); URLs left untouched |
restore accented characters lost to the encoding bug (verified names/words only; URLs untouched) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Some new theoretical and experimental approaches for unambiguous verification of special relativity theory (SRT) are discussed. A class of phenomena for which SRT and covariant ether theories (CET's) give different predictions is identified. The physical meaning of these phenomena is discussed. It is concluded that, under modern development of experimental technique, a critical choice between SRT and CET's can be made by means of | Some new theoretical and experimental approaches for unambiguous verification of special relativity theory (SRT) are discussed. A class of phenomena for which SRT and covariant ether theories (CET's) give different predictions is identified. The physical meaning of these phenomena is discussed. It is concluded that, under modern development of experimental technique, a critical choice between SRT and CET's can be made by means of Mössbauer spectroscopy | ||
</span></p> | </span></p> | ||
Latest revision as of 09:20, 22 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Covariant Ether Theories: Part II |
| Author(s) | Alexander L Kholmetskii |
| Keywords | Ether, special relativity theory, SRT |
| Published | 2004 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 15 |
| Number | S1 |
| Pages | 9-13 |
Abstract
Some new theoretical and experimental approaches for unambiguous verification of special relativity theory (SRT) are discussed. A class of phenomena for which SRT and covariant ether theories (CET's) give different predictions is identified. The physical meaning of these phenomena is discussed. It is concluded that, under modern development of experimental technique, a critical choice between SRT and CET's can be made by means of Mössbauer spectroscopy