Jump to content

The Unsoundness of Special Relativity Theory: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
fix apostrophes lost to the character-encoding bug (Einstein?s -> Einstein's); URLs left untouched
 
Line 11: Line 11:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


This paper gives mathematical grounds to the argument that Lorentz?s transformations are deduced with the violation of logic and elementary mathematical rules. To accord the laws of mechanics and electrodynamics there must be introduced a concept of ?imaginary motion?, which should be grounded logically. There is a proposal of setting two experiments that confirm the existence of an ether. There is an explanation of Fizeau?s experiment and the fact that during the Earth?s movement along its trajectory, the molecules of air remain.
This paper gives mathematical grounds to the argument that Lorentz's transformations are deduced with the violation of logic and elementary mathematical rules. To accord the laws of mechanics and electrodynamics there must be introduced a concept of ?imaginary motion?, which should be grounded logically. There is a proposal of setting two experiments that confirm the existence of an ether. There is an explanation of Fizeau's experiment and the fact that during the Earth's movement along its trajectory, the molecules of air remain.


[[Category:Scientific Paper|unsoundness special relativity theory]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|unsoundness special relativity theory]]


[[Category:Relativity|unsoundness special relativity theory]]
[[Category:Relativity|unsoundness special relativity theory]]

Latest revision as of 09:06, 22 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleThe Unsoundness of Special Relativity Theory
Author(s)Vladimir P Lavrushkin
Published2007
JournalGalilean Electrodynamics
Volume18
NumberS1
Pages18-20

Abstract

This paper gives mathematical grounds to the argument that Lorentz's transformations are deduced with the violation of logic and elementary mathematical rules. To accord the laws of mechanics and electrodynamics there must be introduced a concept of ?imaginary motion?, which should be grounded logically. There is a proposal of setting two experiments that confirm the existence of an ether. There is an explanation of Fizeau's experiment and the fact that during the Earth's movement along its trajectory, the molecules of air remain.