Jump to content

Time as the Generator of Life: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


"Ontology of Time is a new stage of Human Knowledge where Time is finally understood. Time is exactly what was in long history of Metaphysics mistakenly named Non-Being, or in eastern Religions and Philosophies ? Nothingness, Emptiness. However, from non-spatiality and non-corporeality (the key properties of Non-Being) isn't necessarily following the ?non-existence'. The Emptiness and Nothingness are relative notions dependent on fullness and ?somethingness? and are not adequate for what they should signify. "
"Ontology of Time is a new stage of Human Knowledge where Time is finally understood. Time is exactly what was in long history of Metaphysics mistakenly named Non-Being, or in eastern Religions and Philosophies ? Nothingness, Emptiness. However, from non-spatiality and non-corporeality (the key properties of Non-Being) isn't necessarily following the ?non-existence'. The Emptiness and Nothingness are relative notions dependent on fullness and "somethingness" and are not adequate for what they should signify. "


[[Category:Scientific Paper|time generator life]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|time generator life]]


[[Category:Relativity|time generator life]]
[[Category:Relativity|time generator life]]

Latest revision as of 13:59, 22 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleTime as the Generator of Life
Read in fullLink to paper (Internet Archive)
Author(s)Velimir Abramovic
Published2008

Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)

Abstract

"Ontology of Time is a new stage of Human Knowledge where Time is finally understood. Time is exactly what was in long history of Metaphysics mistakenly named Non-Being, or in eastern Religions and Philosophies ? Nothingness, Emptiness. However, from non-spatiality and non-corporeality (the key properties of Non-Being) isn't necessarily following the ?non-existence'. The Emptiness and Nothingness are relative notions dependent on fullness and "somethingness" and are not adequate for what they should signify. "