Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper: Difference between revisions
Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
| journal = [[Old and New Concepts of Physics]] | | journal = [[Old and New Concepts of Physics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 5 | ||
| number = | | number = 3 | ||
| num_pages = 6 | | num_pages = 6 | ||
| pages = 553-558 | | pages = 553-558 | ||
Latest revision as of 09:32, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Ajay Sharma |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Old and New Concepts of Physics |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 3 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 553-558 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here.