Three Arguments on the Nature of Space: Difference between revisions
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
Add to Category:Electromagnetism |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Category:Gravity|arguments nature space]] | [[Category:Gravity|arguments nature space]] | ||
[[Category:Electromagnetism]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:42, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Three Arguments on the Nature of Space |
| Author(s) | John B Kizer |
| Keywords | nature, space, geometry, general relativity, Maxwell's equations, Lesagian particles, waves |
| Published | 1983 |
| Pages | 39-43 |
Abstract
The best and simplest models of reality are visualizable models as opposed to formal models. It is proved that non-Euclidean geometry only exists as a special case of a higher dimensional Euclidean geometry, thereby negating general relativity.
The infalling saves of Maxwell's equations, a perennial problem for electrodynamics theorists, can be explained as Lesagian particles (or waves).
A consistent theory of the Lorentz transformation is developed, including a new explanation of the Airy experiment.