Is Einstein Wrong: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_294.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_294.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Charles Lane Poor]] | | author = [[Charles Lane Poor]] | ||
| keywords = Einstein, Theory of Relativity | |||
| published = 1924 | | published = 1924 | ||
| num_pages = 12 | | num_pages = 12 | ||
Revision as of 07:27, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Is Einstein Wrong |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Charles Lane Poor |
| Keywords | Einstein, Theory of Relativity |
| Published | 1924 |
| No. of pages | 12 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Forum, V71, N6, pp. 705-716 (June 1924). A Professor of Celestial Mechanics maintains thay Einstein's theory of relativity has not been proved, unless we accept on faith the special pleadings and assumptions of his followers. He calls attention to the wide divergence between stellar positions predicted by Einstein and the actual positions observed at the time of eclipses, and he argues that Newton's conclusions can be equally well vindicated if Newtonians permit themselves similar liberties in explaining away embarrassing facts.