Galilean Interpretation of the Hubble Constant: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| published = 2005 | | published = 2005 | ||
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | | journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 16 | ||
| number = | | number = 6 | ||
| pages = 103-105 | | pages = 103-105 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:34, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Galilean Interpretation of the Hubble Constant |
| Author(s) | Karim Amen Khaidarov |
| Published | 2005 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 103-105 |
Abstract
In December of 1998, there was published a seminal work using precise measurements of supernovae magnitudes and leading to the conclusion of an apparent accelerated expansion of the observed part of the Universe. But when we approach the processing of these precise data from a classical ethereal position, without relativistic adjustments, we get another picture, and we believe it is the correct one. It is presented in this paper.
Dedicated to the bright memory of my daughter Anastasia. August 1, 2003