Modern Analysis of the Boltzmann Distribution: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Modern Analysis of the Boltzmann Distribution | | title = Modern Analysis of the Boltzmann Distribution | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20080512064946/http://www.wbabin.net/physics/kalanov16.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | |||
| author = [[Temur Z Kalanov]] | | author = [[Temur Z Kalanov]] | ||
| keywords = [[Boltzmann]] | | keywords = [[Boltzmann]] | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
| journal = [[General Science Journal]] | | journal = [[General Science Journal]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20080512064946/http://www.wbabin.net/physics/kalanov16.pdf here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)'' | |||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Latest revision as of 08:29, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Modern Analysis of the Boltzmann Distribution |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | Temur Z Kalanov |
| Keywords | Boltzmann |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | General Science Journal |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
Modern analysis of the Boltzmann distribution on the basis of probability theory and Gibbs quantum canonical distribution is proposed. It is shown that the Boltzmann distribution function is neither a reliable result of probability theory nor a consequence of Gibbs quantum canonical distribution. The conclusion is that the Boltzmann distribution function has no physicalstatistical meaning, and the concept “Boltzmann distribution” should be abolished.