A New Definition of Parallelism: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 2007 | | published = 2007 | ||
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | | journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 4 | ||
| number = | | number = 2 | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
| pages = 202 | | pages = 202 | ||
Latest revision as of 09:17, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A New Definition of Parallelism |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | John-Erik Persson |
| Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 2 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
| Pages | 202 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The fifth postulate of Euclid, the parallel postulate, was formulated in 300 B C, and is still not proved as a theorem although many have tried to do that. The reason for this is NOT to be found in tha postulate per se but in the definition of paralletism. The most common definition states that PARALLEL LINES NEVER MEET. It will be demonstrated here that why this definition is WRONG and why parallelism is hard to define.