Jump to content

The Greatest Mathematical Scandals of the World: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = The Greatest Mathematical Scandals of the World
| title = The Greatest Mathematical Scandals of the World
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20100619130241/http://www.wbabin.net/math/xuan42.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
| author = [[Chun-Xuan Jiang]]
| author = [[Chun-Xuan Jiang]]
| keywords = [[Mathematics]]
| keywords = [[Mathematics]]
Line 7: Line 8:
| num_pages = 17
| num_pages = 17
}}
}}
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20100619130241/http://www.wbabin.net/math/xuan42.pdf here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''


==Abstract==
==Abstract==


Szemeredi Theorem (1975): Any subset of the integers of positive density contains arbitrarily long arithmetics progressions[10] which is not directly related to the arithmetic progressions and is false.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
Szemeredi Theorem (1975): Any subset of the integers of positive density contains arbitrarily long arithmetics progressions[10] which is not directly related to the arithmetic progressions and is false.
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|greatest mathematical scandals world]]

Latest revision as of 08:29, 20 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleThe Greatest Mathematical Scandals of the World
Read in fullLink to paper (Internet Archive)
Author(s)Chun-Xuan Jiang
KeywordsMathematics
Published2009
JournalGeneral Science Journal
No. of pages17

Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)

Abstract

Szemeredi Theorem (1975): Any subset of the integers of positive density contains arbitrarily long arithmetics progressions[10] which is not directly related to the arithmetic progressions and is false.