Relativistic Cosmology Revisited: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Relativistic Cosmology Revisited | | title = Relativistic Cosmology Revisited | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20070711044654/http://ptep-online.com/index_files/2007/PP-09-05.PDF Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | |||
| author = [[Stephen John Crothers]] | | author = [[Stephen John Crothers]] | ||
| keywords = [[Relativity]], [[Cosmology]] | | keywords = [[Relativity]], [[Cosmology]] | ||
| published = 2007 | | published = 2007 | ||
| journal = [[Progress In Physics]] | | journal = [[Progress In Physics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 2 | ||
| pages = 27-30 | | pages = 27-30 | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20070711044654/http://ptep-online.com/index_files/2007/PP-09-05.PDF here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)'' | |||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
In a previous paper the writer treated of particular classes of cosmological solutions for certain Einstein spaces and claimed that no such solutions exist in relation thereto. In that paper the assumption that the proper radius is zero when the line-element is singular was generally applied. This general assumption is unjustified and must be dropped. Consequently, solutions do exist in relation to the aforementioned types, and are explored herein. The concept of the Big Bang cosmology is found to be inconsistent with General Relativity.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | In a previous paper the writer treated of particular classes of cosmological solutions for certain Einstein spaces and claimed that no such solutions exist in relation thereto. In that paper the assumption that the proper radius is zero when the line-element is singular was generally applied. This general assumption is unjustified and must be dropped. Consequently, solutions do exist in relation to the aforementioned types, and are explored herein. The concept of the Big Bang cosmology is found to be inconsistent with General Relativity. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relativistic cosmology revisited]] | |||
[[Category:Cosmology]] | [[Category:Cosmology|relativistic cosmology revisited]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:34, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Relativistic Cosmology Revisited |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | Stephen John Crothers |
| Keywords | Relativity, Cosmology |
| Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Progress In Physics |
| Volume | 2 |
| Pages | 27-30 |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
In a previous paper the writer treated of particular classes of cosmological solutions for certain Einstein spaces and claimed that no such solutions exist in relation thereto. In that paper the assumption that the proper radius is zero when the line-element is singular was generally applied. This general assumption is unjustified and must be dropped. Consequently, solutions do exist in relation to the aforementioned types, and are explored herein. The concept of the Big Bang cosmology is found to be inconsistent with General Relativity.