Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake | | title = Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_849.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_849.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Ajay Sharma]] | | author = [[Ajay Sharma]] | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
| journal = [[Old and New Concepts of Physics]] | | journal = [[Old and New Concepts of Physics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 5 | ||
| number = | | number = 3 | ||
| num_pages = 6 | | num_pages = 6 | ||
| pages = 553-558 | | pages = 553-558 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|ajay sharma rejustifies paper generalization e mc pointing elementary mistake 's andrew george 's paper]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:32, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Ajay Sharma |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Old and New Concepts of Physics |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 3 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 553-558 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here.