Superluminal Speeds and Superconductivity: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Superluminal Speeds and Superconductivity | | title = Superluminal Speeds and Superconductivity | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20070309111121/http://www.wbabin.net/babin/super.htm Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | |||
| author = [[Walter Babin]] | | author = [[Walter Babin]] | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
| num_pages = 4 | | num_pages = 4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20070309111121/http://www.wbabin.net/babin/super.htm here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)'' | |||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Both superluminal velocities and superconductivity are shown to devolve naturally from the generalized equations of motion identified in an earlier paper1. The behavior of "mass" as it approaches and exceeds light speed under uniform acceleration is illustrated and the statistical anomaly of barrier potential tunnelling is resolved. A significant difference between the angular and linear velocities involved in orbital motion is identified. Introduction: Sufficient experimental evidence exists for superluminal velocities although such is not accepted by the scientific community. This is primarily due to the assumed limitations on light speed imposed by special relativity and classical electrodynamics as well as the lack of a sound theoretical basis for exceeding it. Conversely, superconductivity is a well-established and recognized phenomenon but it also suffers from the absence of a comprehensive theory. In the following, it is shown they are both readily explained by one theory and identified as the extreme positions of kinetic and potential energies.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | Both superluminal velocities and superconductivity are shown to devolve naturally from the generalized equations of motion identified in an earlier paper1. The behavior of "mass" as it approaches and exceeds light speed under uniform acceleration is illustrated and the statistical anomaly of barrier potential tunnelling is resolved. A significant difference between the angular and linear velocities involved in orbital motion is identified. Introduction: Sufficient experimental evidence exists for superluminal velocities although such is not accepted by the scientific community. This is primarily due to the assumed limitations on light speed imposed by special relativity and classical electrodynamics as well as the lack of a sound theoretical basis for exceeding it. Conversely, superconductivity is a well-established and recognized phenomenon but it also suffers from the absence of a comprehensive theory. In the following, it is shown they are both readily explained by one theory and identified as the extreme positions of kinetic and potential energies. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|superluminal speeds superconductivity]] | |||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|superluminal speeds superconductivity]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:19, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Superluminal Speeds and Superconductivity |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | Walter Babin |
| Keywords | Superconductivity, lightspeed limits, Tunnelling efect, Superluminal velocity |
| Published | 2003 |
| Journal | General Science Journal |
| No. of pages | 4 |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
Both superluminal velocities and superconductivity are shown to devolve naturally from the generalized equations of motion identified in an earlier paper1. The behavior of "mass" as it approaches and exceeds light speed under uniform acceleration is illustrated and the statistical anomaly of barrier potential tunnelling is resolved. A significant difference between the angular and linear velocities involved in orbital motion is identified. Introduction: Sufficient experimental evidence exists for superluminal velocities although such is not accepted by the scientific community. This is primarily due to the assumed limitations on light speed imposed by special relativity and classical electrodynamics as well as the lack of a sound theoretical basis for exceeding it. Conversely, superconductivity is a well-established and recognized phenomenon but it also suffers from the absence of a comprehensive theory. In the following, it is shown they are both readily explained by one theory and identified as the extreme positions of kinetic and potential energies.