An Unexpected Source of Clean Energy: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 2006 | | published = 2006 | ||
| journal = [[Infinite Energy]] | | journal = [[Infinite Energy]] | ||
| number = | | number = 67 | ||
| num_pages = 3 | | num_pages = 3 | ||
| pages = 33-35 | | pages = 33-35 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;">This paper includes reasons to suspect that vacuum is not a void, but rather a matrix of touching protons and unpaired electrons (possibly Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen). Quotes are included from scientists, including Sir J.J. Thomson, that indicate hydrogen gas has been produced in and from vacuum. Quotes from Christiaan Huygens and James Clerk Maxwell demonstrate that their electromagnetic equations were developed assuming a matrix of touching material particles. Quotes from Albert Einstein indicate that in employing Maxwell's equations, he was unknowingly assuming the presence of a material ether. The techniques for producing hydrogen from vacuum (the ether?) require the input of considerable energy. Conversion of hydrogen into the matrix (the ether?) would produce considerable energy. Could the energy produced in lightning storms be the result of conversion of hydrogen in the water of moist air into ether under high voltage electrical discharge? </div> | <div style="text-align: justify;">This paper includes reasons to suspect that vacuum is not a void, but rather a matrix of touching protons and unpaired electrons (possibly Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen). Quotes are included from scientists, including Sir J.J. Thomson, that indicate hydrogen gas has been produced in and from vacuum. Quotes from Christiaan Huygens and James Clerk Maxwell demonstrate that their electromagnetic equations were developed assuming a matrix of touching material particles. Quotes from Albert Einstein indicate that in employing Maxwell's equations, he was unknowingly assuming the presence of a material ether. The techniques for producing hydrogen from vacuum (the ether?) require the input of considerable energy. Conversion of hydrogen into the matrix (the ether?) would produce considerable energy. Could the energy produced in lightning storms be the result of conversion of hydrogen in the water of moist air into ether under high voltage electrical discharge? </div> | ||
[[Category:New Energy]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|unexpected source clean energy]] | ||
[[Category:New Energy|unexpected source clean energy]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:27, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | An Unexpected Source of Clean Energy |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Paul E Rowe |
| Keywords | ether, hydrogen, touching protons |
| Published | 2006 |
| Journal | Infinite Energy |
| Number | 67 |
| No. of pages | 3 |
| Pages | 33-35 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This paper includes reasons to suspect that vacuum is not a void, but rather a matrix of touching protons and unpaired electrons (possibly Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen). Quotes are included from scientists, including Sir J.J. Thomson, that indicate hydrogen gas has been produced in and from vacuum. Quotes from Christiaan Huygens and James Clerk Maxwell demonstrate that their electromagnetic equations were developed assuming a matrix of touching material particles. Quotes from Albert Einstein indicate that in employing Maxwell's equations, he was unknowingly assuming the presence of a material ether. The techniques for producing hydrogen from vacuum (the ether?) require the input of considerable energy. Conversion of hydrogen into the matrix (the ether?) would produce considerable energy. Could the energy produced in lightning storms be the result of conversion of hydrogen in the water of moist air into ether under high voltage electrical discharge?