A Relativity Theorem, with Huge Consequences: Difference between revisions
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 2011 | | published = 2011 | ||
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | | journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 8 | ||
| num_pages = 3 | | num_pages = 3 | ||
| pages = 129-132 | | pages = 129-132 | ||
Latest revision as of 09:37, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A Relativity Theorem, with Huge Consequences |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | David V Connell |
| Keywords | relativity, reference frame |
| Published | 2011 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 8 |
| No. of pages | 3 |
| Pages | 129-132 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Previously missing, but not conspicuous by their absence, local and universal constants are now defined, and a standard test for them based on relativity is created, resulting in three universal constants, all having the same dimensions. From this and little else, a valid set of relativistic changes for each of the two types of reference frame, agreeing exactly with sets previously derived from laws of physics, is derived in only a few lines. A different set, adopted by SR and GR, disagrees with the laws of nature, which invalidates those theories, and more than a dozen consequences are given to illustrate how much some physics theories have been diverted from Nature?s truths.