The Philadelphia Experiment Revisited – Part I: Difference between revisions
Fix mojibake in body (reviewed batch) |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 1992 | | published = 1992 | ||
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | | journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | ||
| number = | | number = 7 | ||
| num_pages = 8 | | num_pages = 8 | ||
| pages = 15-25 | | pages = 15-25 | ||
Latest revision as of 09:33, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Philadelphia Experiment Revisited – Part I |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Joseph Pothier |
| Keywords | history, investigative report, Philadelphia experiment |
| Published | 1992 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 7 |
| No. of pages | 8 |
| Pages | 15-25 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This essay is the first part of a two-part critique of what is called the Philadelphia Experiment and will focus on the experiment as a possible episode in naval history. It asks a simple question: Did the Philadelphia Experiment take place? This essay applies an historical methodology to answer that question.