Jump to content

Piccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
m ClaudeBot moved page Piccard-Kessler?s Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction to Piccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction: Fix mojibake: restore apostrophe / Ampère (unambiguous rules only)
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = Piccard-Kessler?s Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction
| title = Piccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_821.pdf Link to paper]
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_821.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]]
| author = [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]]
Line 6: Line 6:
| published = 2002
| published = 2002
| journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]]
| journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]]
| volume = [[4]]
| volume = 4
| number = [[5]]
| number = 5
| num_pages = 4
| num_pages = 4
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 09:22, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitlePiccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)Vyacheslav N Streltsov
KeywordsLorentz contraction, Heaviside potential, Piccard-Kessler's experiment.
Published2002
JournalJournal of Theoretics
Volume4
Number5
No. of pages4

Read the full paper here

Abstract

According to the generally accepted opinion, the electric field of a moving charge has the form of oblate revolution ellipsoid in accordance with the Lorentz contraction formula. This picture, however, contradicts the known experiment based on the gas-efflux method.