Jump to content

On the General Solution to Einstein's Vacuum Field for the Point-Mass when lambda ???0 and Its Consequences for Relativistic Cosmology: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
restore accented characters lost to the encoding bug (verified names/words only; URLs untouched)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = On the General Solution to Einstein's Vacuum Field for the Point-Mass when lambda ???0 and Its Consequences for Relativistic Cosmology
| title = On the General Solution to Einstein\'s Vacuum Field for the Point-Mass when lambda ???0 and Its Consequences for Relativistic Cosmology
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20100928140011/http://ptep-online.com/index_files/2005/PP-03-02.PDF Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
| author = [[Stephen John Crothers]]
| author = [[Stephen John Crothers]]
| keywords = [[Einstein's Vacuum Field]], [[Point-Mass]], [[Relativistic Cosmology]]
| keywords = [[Einstein's Vacuum Field]], [[Point-Mass]], [[Relativistic Cosmology]]
| published = 2005
| published = 2005
| journal = [[Progress In Physics]]
| journal = [[Progress In Physics]]
| volume = [[3]]
| volume = 3
| pages = 7-18
| pages = 7-18
}}
}}
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20100928140011/http://ptep-online.com/index_files/2005/PP-03-02.PDF here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''


==Abstract==
==Abstract==


It is generally alleged that Einstein?fs theory leads to a finite but unbounded universe. This allegation stems from an incorrect analysis of the metric for the point-mass when ??&nbsp;&lt;&gt; 0. The standard analysis has incorrectly assumed that the variable <em>r</em> denotes a radius in the gravitational field. Since <em>r</em> is in fact nothing more than a real-valued parameter for the actual radial quantities in the gravitational field, the standard interpretation is erroneous. Moreover, the true radial quantities lead inescapably to ??=0 so that, cosmologically, Einstein?fs theory predicts an infinite, static, empty universe
It is generally alleged that Einstein's theory leads to a finite but unbounded universe. This allegation stems from an incorrect analysis of the metric for the point-mass when ??&nbsp;&lt;&gt; 0. The standard analysis has incorrectly assumed that the variable <em>r</em> denotes a radius in the gravitational field. Since <em>r</em> is in fact nothing more than a real-valued parameter for the actual radial quantities in the gravitational field, the standard interpretation is erroneous. Moreover, the true radial quantities lead inescapably to ??=0 so that, cosmologically, Einstein's theory predicts an infinite, static, empty universe


[[Category:Scientific Paper|general solution einstein 's vacuum field point-mass lambda consequences relativistic cosmology]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|general solution einstein 's vacuum field point-mass lambda consequences relativistic cosmology]]


[[Category:Cosmology|general solution einstein 's vacuum field point-mass lambda consequences relativistic cosmology]]
[[Category:Cosmology|general solution einstein 's vacuum field point-mass lambda consequences relativistic cosmology]]

Latest revision as of 15:06, 22 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleOn the General Solution to Einstein\'s Vacuum Field for the Point-Mass when lambda ???0 and Its Consequences for Relativistic Cosmology
Read in fullLink to paper (Internet Archive)
Author(s)Stephen John Crothers
KeywordsEinstein's Vacuum Field, Point-Mass, Relativistic Cosmology
Published2005
JournalProgress In Physics
Volume3
Pages7-18

Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)

Abstract

It is generally alleged that Einstein's theory leads to a finite but unbounded universe. This allegation stems from an incorrect analysis of the metric for the point-mass when ?? <> 0. The standard analysis has incorrectly assumed that the variable r denotes a radius in the gravitational field. Since r is in fact nothing more than a real-valued parameter for the actual radial quantities in the gravitational field, the standard interpretation is erroneous. Moreover, the true radial quantities lead inescapably to ??=0 so that, cosmologically, Einstein's theory predicts an infinite, static, empty universe