Jump to content

Potential Theory in Classical Electrodynamics: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
fix apostrophes lost to the character-encoding bug (Einstein?s -> Einstein's); URLs left untouched
 
Line 3: Line 3:
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6819.pdf Link to paper]
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6819.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Wolfgang Engelhardt]]
| author = [[Wolfgang Engelhardt]]
| keywords = [[Classical Electrodynamics]], [[Maxwell?s equations]]
| keywords = [[Classical Electrodynamics]], [[Maxwell's equations]]
| published = 2012
| published = 2012
| num_pages = 8
| num_pages = 8

Latest revision as of 09:03, 22 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitlePotential Theory in Classical Electrodynamics
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)Wolfgang Engelhardt
KeywordsClassical Electrodynamics, Maxwell's equations
Published2012
No. of pages8

Read the full paper here

Abstract

In Maxwell's classical theory of electrodynamics the fields are frequently expressed by potentials in order to facilitate the solution of the first order system of equations. This method obscures, however, that there exists an inconsistency between Faraday's law of induction and Maxwell's flux law. As a consequence of this internal contradiction there is neither gauge invariance, nor exist unique solutions in general. The retarded integrals, in particular, turn out not to represent proper solutions of the inhomogeneous wave equations.