Five Frozen Needles CF Protocol: Difference between revisions
Add full-text link (reconnected from abstracts archive; URL verified live) |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 2002 | | published = 2002 | ||
| journal = [[Journal of New Energy]] | | journal = [[Journal of New Energy]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 6 | ||
| number = | | number = 2 | ||
| pages = 30-33 | | pages = 30-33 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|frozen needles cf protocol]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|frozen needles cf protocol]] | ||
[[Category:Cold Fusion]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:32, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Five Frozen Needles CF Protocol |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Robert W Bass |
| Keywords | Electricity, Matter creation, Helium, Cold fusion |
| Published | 2002 |
| Journal | Journal of New Energy |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 30-33 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The following protocol is designed to be intuitively convincing to a layman who, if told that needles 2, 3 and 4 have been pulsed with constant-voltage DC-electricity for twice, thrice and quadruple the amount of time as needle 1, and then measured to contain twice, thrice and quadruple the amount of He4 as the first needle, will instantly reject any doubt that the electrical pulse was creating He4 from some form of nuclear-chemistry process whose action was directly proportional to the amount of DC electrical energy used. At the same time, the protocol is sufficiently statistically sophisticated in its rigorous application of Experiment Design theory as to satisfy the most skeptical and informed critic.