Jump to content

Interstellar Drives: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| published = 2008
| published = 2008
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]]
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]]
| number = [[44]]
| number = 44
| pages = 8-12
| pages = 8-12
}}
}}
Line 11: Line 11:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings.


[[Category:Gravity]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|interstellar drives]]
 
[[Category:Gravity|interstellar drives]]

Latest revision as of 09:22, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleInterstellar Drives
Author(s)David Rosignoli
Keywordsexotic matter, hyperspace, interstellar travel, teleportation, worm holes
Published2008
JournalElectric Spacecraft Journal
Number44
Pages8-12

Abstract

Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings.