Hendershot and Prentice Generators: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 1992 | | published = 1992 | ||
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | | journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | ||
| number = | | number = 7 | ||
| pages = 33-37 | | pages = 33-37 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Category:New Energy|hendershot prentice generators]] | [[Category:New Energy|hendershot prentice generators]] | ||
[[Category:Propulsion]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:33, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Hendershot and Prentice Generators |
| Author(s) | Martin Holwerda |
| Keywords | New Energy, Hendershot Motor, Magnetic Motor, Prentice generator |
| Published | 1992 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 7 |
| Pages | 33-37 |
Abstract
A comparison of two ?free energy? devices shows the likeness of the Hendershot and Prentice generators. Both are claimed to obtain energy from the natural earth environment and are similar to T. Henry Moray's work. Of the two, the Prentice device appears easier to replicate and understand.