Relatively Boring: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 1986 | | published = 1986 | ||
| journal = [[Electronics and Wireless World]] | | journal = [[Electronics and Wireless World]] | ||
| number = | | number = Feb | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relatively boring]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|relatively boring]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|relatively boring]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Relatively Boring |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Burniston Brown |
| Published | 1986 |
| Journal | Electronics and Wireless World |
| Number | Feb |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
H. Morgan complains in your July issue that relativity is boring. This view will be shared by many physicists, but they do not seem to have noticed that one cause of the confusions and contradictions is that it is not a scientific theory...