Nonlocality, Unreality, and Bell Theorem: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
fix apostrophes lost to the character-encoding bug (Einstein?s -> Einstein's); URLs left untouched |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| author = [[Al F Kracklauer]] | | author = [[Al F Kracklauer]] | ||
| published = 2006 | | published = 2006 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
I argue that Bell | I argue that Bell's argument for nonlocality is the result of an error in the use of Bayes? formula. By correcting this error all derivations of Bell Inequalities become impossible. Further, I show by direct construction and simulation that the data from EPR- and GHZ-type experiments can be explained by the classical formulas for higher order correlations. Additionally, I argue that irreality is a consequence of the assumption that QM is complete. Superposition of mutually exclusive states arise in classical mechanics for coupled oscillators where the energy sloshes back and forth between two modes. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|nonlocality unreality bell theorem]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|nonlocality unreality bell theorem]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:02, 22 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Nonlocality, Unreality, and Bell Theorem |
| Author(s) | Al F Kracklauer |
| Published | 2006 |
Abstract
I argue that Bell's argument for nonlocality is the result of an error in the use of Bayes? formula. By correcting this error all derivations of Bell Inequalities become impossible. Further, I show by direct construction and simulation that the data from EPR- and GHZ-type experiments can be explained by the classical formulas for higher order correlations. Additionally, I argue that irreality is a consequence of the assumption that QM is complete. Superposition of mutually exclusive states arise in classical mechanics for coupled oscillators where the energy sloshes back and forth between two modes.