Interstellar Drives: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | | journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]] | ||
| number = | | number = 44 | ||
| pages = 8-12 | | pages = 8-12 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|interstellar drives]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|interstellar drives]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity|interstellar drives]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:22, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Interstellar Drives |
| Author(s) | David Rosignoli |
| Keywords | exotic matter, hyperspace, interstellar travel, teleportation, worm holes |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 44 |
| Pages | 8-12 |
Abstract
Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings.