Electron beams magnetic field: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| keywords = [[Electron]], [[magnetic field]], [[Maxwell]] | | keywords = [[Electron]], [[magnetic field]], [[Maxwell]] | ||
| published = 2000 | | published = 2000 | ||
| num_pages = 8 | | num_pages = 8 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|electron beams magnetic field]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|electron beams magnetic field]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|electron beams magnetic field]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:26, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Electron beams magnetic field |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Christian Sutterlin |
| Keywords | Electron, magnetic field, Maxwell |
| Published | 2000 |
| No. of pages | 8 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The associated engineers established that the cathodic beam electrons might have a motion of translation without having any magnetic field.
For each direction of measurements, at a given time, the magnetic field exists only in one way but not in the opposite way.
Whatever is the root cause of the cancellation of the magnetic field, this report establishes that the magnetic field of electrons can, in no way, be a result of their motion of translation.