The Fields of the Future: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| title = The Fields of the Future | | title = The Fields of the Future | ||
| author = [[Domina Eberle Spencer]] | | author = [[Domina Eberle Spencer]] | ||
| keywords = fields, velocity of light, electromagnetic theory, Classical Physics, Einstein | |||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Hitherto most of the discussions of the Natural Philosophy Alliance have been devoted to the study of classical physics. We have studied the postulates on the velocity of light. Is the velocity of light a constant as was postulated by Einstein? Or can we conclude that the universal time postulate, that the velocity of light is a constant relative to the source at any instant, is the only postulate that is consistent with all of the experiments hitherto analyzed? Is Newton?s law of gravity universally valid, or must it be modified to take into account the seasonal variation that was discovered by the Monti? Can we believe that Maxwell?s equations, as postulated by Einstein, are universally valid, or must they be replaced with the New Gaussian Electromagnetic Theory? | Hitherto most of the discussions of the Natural Philosophy Alliance have been devoted to the study of classical physics. We have studied the postulates on the velocity of light. Is the velocity of light a constant as was postulated by Einstein? Or can we conclude that the universal time postulate, that the velocity of light is a constant relative to the source at any instant, is the only postulate that is consistent with all of the experiments hitherto analyzed? Is Newton?s law of gravity universally valid, or must it be modified to take into account the seasonal variation that was discovered by the Monti? Can we believe that Maxwell?s equations, as postulated by Einstein, are universally valid, or must they be replaced with the New Gaussian Electromagnetic Theory? | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|fields future]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity|fields future]] | |||
Latest revision as of 07:22, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Fields of the Future |
| Author(s) | Domina Eberle Spencer |
| Keywords | fields, velocity of light, electromagnetic theory, Classical Physics, Einstein |
| Published | 2008 |
Abstract
Hitherto most of the discussions of the Natural Philosophy Alliance have been devoted to the study of classical physics. We have studied the postulates on the velocity of light. Is the velocity of light a constant as was postulated by Einstein? Or can we conclude that the universal time postulate, that the velocity of light is a constant relative to the source at any instant, is the only postulate that is consistent with all of the experiments hitherto analyzed? Is Newton?s law of gravity universally valid, or must it be modified to take into account the seasonal variation that was discovered by the Monti? Can we believe that Maxwell?s equations, as postulated by Einstein, are universally valid, or must they be replaced with the New Gaussian Electromagnetic Theory?